tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4037245285079932974.post6786828866372529515..comments2024-02-18T00:38:12.721-08:00Comments on Trading Daze: Financial Astrology - November 2, 2014tradingdazehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03553138134839203551noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4037245285079932974.post-74995980047120627942014-11-26T14:17:31.989-08:002014-11-26T14:17:31.989-08:00Thanks for sharing this article post. I was lookin...Thanks for sharing this article post. I was looking for something like this. Your articles have inspires me a lot. I have new idea about the same topics in my blog. Thanks <br /><br /><a href="http://maricarda.com/" rel="nofollow">birth time chart</a><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11672850250319162105noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4037245285079932974.post-12995550301364711122014-11-02T17:02:27.727-08:002014-11-02T17:02:27.727-08:00The 4 year low has been elusive of late. I'm l...The 4 year low has been elusive of late. I'm looking at a 6 year cycle and I have a potential low identified.tradingdazehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03553138134839203551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4037245285079932974.post-46624725718114159612014-11-02T16:44:48.586-08:002014-11-02T16:44:48.586-08:00You are correct. It doesn't make much sense t...You are correct. It doesn't make much sense to have a sell off to lower lows in the next two weeks if a new primary cycle started on Oct 15th. This week (Nov 3rd to Nov 7th) would only be the 3rd week of the primary cycle if it started on Oct 15th. Counting the primary cycle from Aug 7th and assuming Oct 15th is a half-primary cycle (the 10th week from Aug 7th) would make much more sense.<br /><br />But Ray did write in an email and I quote "the cycles are so skewed via geocosmics that a top could be forming in the next two weeks already and the next decline could be even lower". When he says lower, of course, I'm assuming lower than the Oct 15th lows. But at the same time he does believe Oct 15th was a contracted 10 week primary cycle. Strange.<br /><br />He also believes there is a possibility of a 4 year cycle low between now and Dec 2014.<br /><br />According to Merriman, the 4 year cycle tends to bottom 16 to 25 months after a USA presidential election which would equate to March to December 2014. We haven’t had a 4 year cycle low yet so time is just about up unless the 4 year cycle bottoms in November or December this year.<br /> <br />In addition, the last 4 year cycle low was in October 2011. Typically the 4 year cycle from low to low has a range of 36 to 56 months which equates to October 2014 to June 2016. <br /> <br />In other words, the overlap period of these two cycles is October to December 2014.<br /><br /><br />KenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4037245285079932974.post-6360369842800688102014-11-02T13:45:33.142-08:002014-11-02T13:45:33.142-08:00What you are saying is that Ray had Oct 15th as a ...What you are saying is that Ray had Oct 15th as a Primary cycle low and at the same time (last paragraph) US equities are going to have a substantial sell-off? New Primaries are usually bullish. I've never seen a distorted 10 week cycle.<br />Ray may be right but I'm sticking to the Aug 7th low and from here we could certainly get a substantial sell-off either with the string of small turn signals starting this week or the Nov 10-12 time frame as defined in the post.<br /><br />Thanks,<br />tradingdazetradingdazehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03553138134839203551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4037245285079932974.post-22557208062104589852014-11-01T19:00:04.026-07:002014-11-01T19:00:04.026-07:00You wrote that the S&P 500 will begin the 13th...You wrote that the S&P 500 will begin the 13th week (Nov 3rd to Nov 7th) of its primary cycle. I hope that is true but I received an email from Raymond Merriman the other day and it's his belief that the lows on Oct 15th were not a half-primary cycle low but instead a distorted 10 week primary cycle low. <br /><br />If Oct15th is the beginning of a new primary cycle then that means the week of Nov 3rd to Nov 10th is only the 3rd week of a newer primary cycle for U.S. equities and there's a lot more time for the S&P 500 to move higher. I really don't know how Raymond Merriman can be certain that Oct 15th was the start of a new primary cycle high and not just a half-primary cycle low but I admit the S&P 500 eliminated 18 trading days of a sell off from Sept 19th to Oct 15th in just 12 trading days (Oct 16th to Oct 31st) which is bullish.<br /><br />I should add that if Oct 15th was a 10 week primary cycle low then that ties for the shortest primary cycle ever in the last 80 years, according to Merriman.<br /><br />Despite where we are in the primary cycle Merriman further stated that there is the possibility of a top forming in U.S. equities and a substantial sell off in the next two weeks because of geocosmics.<br /><br />KenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com